|
|
Post by Panthers and Jets on Sept 16, 2004 10:19:52 GMT -5
The real questions is will you kill yourself the next few years watching this team struggle because they are going to be bad team, but in 3-4 years you will have a powerhouse. suicide is out of the question...gouging my eyes out however.... |
|
|
|
Post by Wild Sabre GM on Sept 16, 2004 10:25:35 GMT -5
suicide is out of the question...gouging my eyes out however.... that could work because then you wouldn't be able to see or read how bad your team is doing. |
|
|
|
Post by pens&preds on Nov 9, 2004 7:11:56 GMT -5
Wally you approved that Martin deal!?
|
|
|
|
Post by Canucks Rangers 94ever on Nov 9, 2004 7:56:30 GMT -5
Whats wrong with it?
|
|
|
|
Post by buffalogm on Nov 9, 2004 9:03:58 GMT -5
I've got more faith in Paul Martin making it big than Milan Kraft, but I think the deal is along the lines of 50-50 without the pick, but still within the realm of 60-40 with the pick.
I never even thought of making a run at Kraft, he would've done me well.
|
|
|
|
Post by pens&preds on Nov 9, 2004 15:33:34 GMT -5
Kraft is garbage, Martin is a premiere D prospect. |
|
|
|
Post by flamesgm on Nov 9, 2004 16:11:35 GMT -5
Kraft is garbage, Martin is a premiere D prospect. and Kraft is mega overrated in this. |
|
|
|
Post by IslanderDuck on Nov 9, 2004 16:13:49 GMT -5
Wally you approved that Martin deal!? Pens. If you didn't realize I asked for a 3rd or 4th line center. I didn't ask for a 1st or 2nd line center. And I might have overpaid somewhat for a center I need because of the fact that Zholtok is now deceased. I can't keep playing 2 rookies as the 3rd and 4th line centers on my team as I am now. And for me to give up Martin was very hard to do but defense is my strong part of my team and I think in the long run getting rid of Martin won't hurt at all. And for the pick I don't that will matter in this years draft. |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Nov 9, 2004 16:29:11 GMT -5
Wally you approved that Martin deal!? Yes. It's within 60/40. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2004 17:43:18 GMT -5
Don't worry Pens overrates Paul Martin. Didn't you say he was gonna be a top 2 defensemen before? |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Nov 9, 2004 17:47:01 GMT -5
Don't worry Pens overrates Paul Martin. Didn't you say he was gonna be a top 2 defensemen before? I think he'll be a good number 3 with pp time. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2004 18:03:00 GMT -5
I think he'll be a good number 3 with pp time. AHHHHHHHH!!!! YOU SAID PP TIME!!! AHHH I would have a great line about that but I'm laughing to hard!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Nov 9, 2004 18:21:24 GMT -5
AHHHHHHHH!!!! YOU SAID PP TIME!!! AHHH I would have a great line about that but I'm laughing to hard!!! Laughin so hard it's PP time? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2004 18:21:44 GMT -5
I think he'll be a good number 3 with pp time. Wait!! with some PP time woulden't he infact be doing a number 1 and not a number 3?? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2004 18:22:24 GMT -5
Laughin so hard it's PP time? LOL *says uh huh in high pitch!!!* |
|
