|
|
Post by Kings and Devils on Jan 25, 2009 0:41:55 GMT -5
It's borderline but it's not a complete blowout and within 60/40. If Brindy helps the Av's go deep into the playoffs then the situation completely changes. And remember that it's not like he's definitely retiring after this year or something, he could be a 3 - 4 year investment.
However, as a GM who used to trade my picks away a lot, you'll regret trading them if you never restock. When your players start retiring, that's assets turning into nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Feb 12, 2009 9:49:48 GMT -5
To Anaheim: Dan Boyle
To Chicago: Anaheim's 1st in 09 and Ondrej Pavelec.
*APPROVED BY PHILADELPHIA**
I have no idea how that muggin got approved but whatever.
|
|
|
|
Post by ducks on Feb 12, 2009 16:45:34 GMT -5
huh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Panthers and Jets on Feb 12, 2009 16:52:31 GMT -5
I guess beacsue the Brindy trade was not allowed, but this one was?
|
|
|
|
Post by ducks on Feb 12, 2009 17:00:59 GMT -5
I think Dan Boyle is 10x the player brindamour is lol, Also like 5 years younger
|
|
|
|
Post by Kings and Devils on Feb 12, 2009 18:36:57 GMT -5
I wouldn't call that a "muggin" either. Pavalec isn't an established goalie by any means, and Richie's 1st will be bottom 15. Instead, he gets Boyle for the rest of his career.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Feb 12, 2009 19:33:15 GMT -5
I wouldn't call that a "muggin" either. Pavalec isn't an established goalie by any means, and Richie's 1st will be bottom 15. Instead, he gets Boyle for the rest of his career. It's a muggin cause Boyle is worth a lot more than what i got. I was goin get the same thing for Brindy but it got denied. But this gets approved? Boyle is leap years ahead in value compared to Brindy. |
|
|
|
Post by FlyersGM on Feb 12, 2009 19:55:24 GMT -5
you gave up more this time.
next time I'll deny it and Boyle can just be dropped to waivers instead, k?
|
|
|
|
Post by habsgm on Feb 12, 2009 20:05:45 GMT -5
^^^ ZING! ^^^
|
|
|
|
Post by Wild Sabre GM on Feb 12, 2009 21:03:23 GMT -5
Actually the trade can't even be approved, this still puts Chicago over the cap.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Feb 12, 2009 21:07:18 GMT -5
next time I'll deny it and Boyle can just be dropped to waivers instead, k? Good job. |
|
|
|
Post by FlyersGM on Feb 12, 2009 21:15:56 GMT -5
How do you figure you were "getting the same" for Brind'Amour? Pavelec is a legit prospect. You're getting a late first AND Pavelec. For Brind'Amour you were getting a mid to late first and second. So Pavelec is worth like a 50th pick? B/c if so, I'll trade you a second for him.
Cry me a river. Funny how unless you brutalize someone in a deal it's no good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2009 21:18:19 GMT -5
I'm confused? Why is one of the smartest GMs in the league, upset that he got beat in a deal if he agreed to it? So confused...
|
|
|
|
Post by FlyersGM on Feb 12, 2009 21:20:06 GMT -5
I'm confused? Why is one of the smartest GMs in the league, upset that he got beat in a deal if he agreed to it? So confused... b/c he had to get under the cap and thinks it's a conspiracy. |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Feb 12, 2009 21:30:31 GMT -5
How do you figure you were "getting the same" for Brind'Amour? Pavelec is a legit prospect. You're getting a late first AND Pavelec. For Brind'Amour you were getting a mid to late first and second. So Pavelec is worth like a 50th pick? B/c if so, I'll trade you a second for him. Cry me a river. Funny how unless you brutalize someone in a deal it's no good. Keep up the good work...... I dunno how you turn down 1 deal and approve another with almost the same return in both. |
|
