Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2005 16:01:24 GMT -5
Blues, I traded Gagne(Who you don't like) ans two lower seconds for Elias, and you had absolutely no problem. No one talk to me, I just traded Gagne............... I doubt that gets approved. It would be different if you were dealing Morrow and Bell there instead of just Gagne though  I thought your trade of Gagne for Elias was a huge win for you just like I posted above. Actually IMO Gagne has around the same value as Datsyuk because Gagne has the amazing defensive play and he's still 2 years younger. |
|
|
|
Post by Preds on Jan 9, 2005 21:08:07 GMT -5
since some interest has been put forth towards this player I'm putting Tony Amonte on the block... looking for a rw'er with some scoring and under the age of 26... Not sure if this is the right place to post this or not but.... Good luck! Rwers are probably the hardest thing to come by I have found in this league... Especially scoring ones! Im gonna home grow my own! Ive only got two on the go right now with any decent potential. Kaspar and Tukonen. Not to mention Amonte is old as fart. |
|
|
|
Post by pens&preds on Jan 10, 2005 8:19:25 GMT -5
Not sure if this is the right place to post this or not but.... Good luck! Rwers are probably the hardest thing to come by I have found in this league... Especially scoring ones! Im gonna home grow my own! Ive only got two on the go right now with any decent potential. Kaspar and Tukonen. Not to mention Amonte is old as fart. yeah, Branko Radivojevic's value is a lot bigger than I thought when I entered. |
|
|
|
Post by Wild Sabre GM on Jan 10, 2005 10:27:41 GMT -5
Not sure if this is the right place to post this or not but.... Good luck! Rwers are probably the hardest thing to come by I have found in this league... Especially scoring ones! Im gonna home grow my own! Ive only got two on the go right now with any decent potential. Kaspar and Tukonen. Not to mention Amonte is old as fart. And I have 4 awesome RW'ers, in Guerin (81), Satan (79), Dumont (76), and Zherdev (76). Though Dumont and Zherdev can also play LW and can also improve as they are both still young. I'm in need of LW'ers actually. My only natural LW is Holmstrom but C. Lapointe can also play LW along with the above mentioned. |
|
|
|
Post by Preds on Jan 10, 2005 17:01:36 GMT -5
Id be willing to make a trade of a LWer to you if Dumont was involved?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2005 18:59:32 GMT -5
And I have 4 awesome RW'ers, in Guerin (81), Satan (79), Dumont (76), and Zherdev (76). Though Dumont and Zherdev can also play LW and can also improve as they are both still young. I'm in need of LW'ers actually. My only natural LW is Holmstrom but C. Lapointe can also play LW along with the above mentioned. I've got Marian Hossa, Justin Williams, Scott Walker, and Typer Wright. Prospect-wise i've got Loui Eriksson and Mike Morris who will be making the NHL pretty soon as well. Now on LW I pretty much am stacked with old guys and a few youngins who look to be two-way fowards and some offensive prospects. |
|
|
|
Post by Preds on Jan 10, 2005 19:44:48 GMT -5
I dont consider Loui Eriksson your prospect, hes pretty much neutral cause u pretty much cheated the rules to get him. But I guess if you can live with that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2005 19:58:07 GMT -5
I dont consider Loui Eriksson your prospect, hes pretty much neutral cause u pretty much cheated the rules to get him. But I guess if you can live with that. He's my property go back and check the thread where Praline stated what I did was 100% within the rules. ps. Will you consider him my property when he scores against your team in a few seasons? |
|
|
|
Post by Preds on Jan 10, 2005 20:21:43 GMT -5
lol Im not all that mad, it was just very devious is all. I have many more prospects that are alot better than him, he woulda been like 7-8 on my depth chart.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Jan 10, 2005 20:24:39 GMT -5
I hate to sound like your mothers but let's keep this to opinions on peoples trades.
Don't make me flick the lights on and off!
|
|
|
|
Post by Panthers and Jets on Jan 10, 2005 22:05:24 GMT -5
I hate to sound like your mothers but let's keep this to opinions on peoples trades. Don't make me flick the lights on and off! haha, if you were my mom, youd be throwing shoes |
|
|
|
Post by pens&preds on Jan 28, 2005 15:53:18 GMT -5
I don't know what to think about this latest deal between Buffalo and Philly. St.Louis is good, but I think Philly may squeak out a close win in this. Shame, I was interested in Doan.
|
|
|
|
Post by buffalogm on Jan 28, 2005 16:38:52 GMT -5
I'd agree that Philly probably wins this deal. I was very aprehensive about giving up Horton and we've been talking about this for a good 2-3 months now. I guess Lombardi makes up for losing Horton a bit, but in the end he still wins. This was just the only way that I was going to land Marty. I'm still in the market for a top C if anyone is looking to send one my way.  |
|
|
|
Post by Preds on Jan 28, 2005 20:39:42 GMT -5
Dang I thought Philly destroyed in this deal! Not unfairly, I just think eventually it will be a blowout... Lombardi is pretty good but wont be more than a top 6, all 3 of the guys the other way could be top line guys... hmmm St.Louis is still small too lol
|
|
|
|
Post by buffalogm on Jan 28, 2005 22:33:57 GMT -5
If that's what I get for being a homer, then that's what I get, I suppose. |
|
