|
Trades
Nov 6, 2013 13:57:43 GMT -5
Post by Wild Sabre GM on Nov 6, 2013 13:57:43 GMT -5
Just want to get some feedback regarding this.
|
|
|
Trades
Nov 6, 2013 14:07:49 GMT -5
Post by FlyersGM on Nov 6, 2013 14:07:49 GMT -5
Nope. No way.
|
|
|
Trades
Nov 6, 2013 15:14:51 GMT -5
Post by Capyotes on Nov 6, 2013 15:14:51 GMT -5
I'm ok with it, but obviously the GM can't negotiate with himself. I think we should have a designated negotiator who will act as the GM for the other team whenever another GM wants to trade between his two teams. Since PHI is already the trade approver, I would nominate him. I think for all trades within GMs, we should also post a poll, and if a plurality dictates it's unfair, it's void. Since the whole reason we each took over another team was to keep them competitive and up to date, I don't see why their players shouldn't be available to all GMs as long as a trade is mutually beneficial/costly.
|
|
|
Trades
Nov 6, 2013 16:12:06 GMT -5
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Nov 6, 2013 16:12:06 GMT -5
If the trade is honest i don't see why not.
|
|
|
Trades
Nov 6, 2013 20:15:53 GMT -5
Post by Leafs/Flames on Nov 6, 2013 20:15:53 GMT -5
Yeah I don't see a problem with it. That is what the trade approval is for anyways. Yeah there is the problem IF the GM is favoring one team but I really don't think anyone here would do such a thing.
|
|
|
Trades
Nov 7, 2013 14:34:25 GMT -5
Post by Wild Sabre GM on Nov 7, 2013 14:34:25 GMT -5
The feedback is great and thank you for that, but please remember to vote!!
|
|