|
|
Post by pens&preds on Aug 30, 2004 9:29:19 GMT -5
That's a toss up. They're both terrible. I think the Flyer fans take it. |
|
|
|
Post by Kings and Devils on Aug 30, 2004 10:41:51 GMT -5
Bell is C/LW and I am pretty positive if needed he could be play RW.
|
|
|
|
Post by pens&preds on Aug 30, 2004 15:08:35 GMT -5
Bell is C/LW and I am pretty positive if needed he could be play RW. I haven't seen too many Hawks games since I moved but I only ever saw Bell playing LW. |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Aug 30, 2004 16:41:32 GMT -5
Bell's a natural Center but he's played LW since he came to the NHL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2004 17:43:45 GMT -5
Sundstrom,Cairns 2nd>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Daley With future telling abilities like yours, i'd be a lot better, you're right. Why can't you see Gagne being a 78..Oh, right because he was kept in Philly while they dumped your loveboy Williams. Yep, Hawks are going to shock the world with 2 left wingers on the same line. I'ts callled the "overload". The point here is Gagne, Bell, and Morrow all have similar values. I'd personally choose both over Gagne having seen Gagne play a lot and I see him as a good 2nd line foward or an average first line foward. He has only regressed since the 2001-2002 season. At least Williams showed signs of getting better and backed it up  By the way Ruutu is a center and a damn good one at that. Besides his lack of defensive play i'd seriously take Ruutu for 1 season over Roenick next season if both were completely healthy. |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Aug 30, 2004 18:43:29 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2004 18:55:28 GMT -5
I was always under the impression he lined up as the 3rd line center and eventually the 2nd. Who'd he play with anyway? With Daze backt his year and Bell as the 2nd line LW I guess Ruutu might take over the center abilities? |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Aug 30, 2004 19:11:19 GMT -5
I was always under the impression he lined up as the 3rd line center and eventually the 2nd. Who'd he play with anyway? With Daze backt his year and Bell as the 2nd line LW I guess Ruutu might take over the center abilities? To start the year he was playin with Daze. But that didn't last long cause Daze got hurt. He bounced around on the 2nd and 3rd lines. For a long time he had moen and nichol on his line.  He wasn't goin to get any points with them. He started to heat up and got to play with Arnason. Once Sully was traded (right around the time Daze came back) they formed a Ruutu-Arnason-Daze line for the rest of the season. If Arnason isn't traded and the Hawks don't sign a 1st liner (they said they will but don't believe anythin they say) i expect them to form the same top line of Ruutu-Arny-Daze. For some reason Sutter likes Ruutu at LW. Bell will probably be on the 3rd line again. Bell-Brown-Barnaby |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Aug 30, 2004 21:37:04 GMT -5
To NYI: Rachunek and Anahiems 3rd round pick in '05 To St. Louis: Boynton Sorry isles but it looks like you're blues bitch now. First the whole Nieds thing then arnott for bonk now rachunek for boynton. Don't know if you like givin up your better players for worse rated ones but you're doin a real good job of it. dvhl.topcities.com/fhldvhl5/TRANSFER/dvhl2005Players.htmlYou might want to check those out before your next deal, isles. You're becoming a lotto team in a hurry. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2004 23:11:58 GMT -5
Bell will probably be on the 3rd line again. Bell-Brown-Barnaby That's bloody crap and you know it Monkey boy!!! There is no way Calder is more then a fill in top 6 forward, Bell probley won't be a full time top line player but he should be a good 2nd line Winger, Calder - Brown - Barnaby would be the better line! AHHH that makes me angry when hawks fans put that as a line!!!! , Bell - Yakabov - Radulov would be the better line, Bell would be better at protecting Yakabov and Radulov, WAAAY better then Calder! |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Aug 30, 2004 23:28:45 GMT -5
That's bloody crap and you know it Monkey boy!!! There is no way Calder is more then a fill in top 6 forward, Bell probley won't be a full time top line player but he should be a good 2nd line Winger, Calder - Brown - Barnaby would be the better line! AHHH that makes me angry when hawks fans put that as a line!!!! , Bell - Yakabov - Radulov would be the better line, Bell would be better at protecting Yakabov and Radulov, WAAAY better then Calder! Bell will be a 3rd liner again. Pulford called Calder a 1st liner so Daze could find himself on the 2nd. I guess they like Bells grit on the 3rd line. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2004 23:30:49 GMT -5
Pulford called Calder a 1st liner . you told me you were Pulford?? that's why I was yelling at you! |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Aug 30, 2004 23:33:55 GMT -5
you told me you were Pulford?? that's why I was yelling at you! I'm not pulford, i'm Mr. Wirtz. Bell will be on the 3rd line again and Calder will be on the top 2. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2004 23:35:37 GMT -5
I'm not pulford, i'm Mr. Wirtz. Bell will be on the 3rd line again and Calder will be on the top 2. great, guess I'll have to become a full time Jackets Rangers fan! Rick Nash here I come! |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago and Montreal on Aug 30, 2004 23:35:51 GMT -5
There is no way Calder is more then a fill in top 6 forward That's horse Manewer! 21 goals in 66 games. Ruutu wouldn't have led the team in goals if Calder didn't break his leg. |
|
He wasn't goin to get any points with them.